Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Author: (Person who wrote report.) Editor: (Person evaluating report.) Total Score for this Evaluation: _/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Read author's report.
Carefully evaluate report by assigning a score for each criterion
provide constructive comments that will help the strengthen the author's report for each category.
Create a link to your evaluation at the end of the report.
Rubric
Introduction = _ / 5 pts.
5 - Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4 - Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3 - Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2 - Intro fails to name the school, district, and community.
0 - No introduction section is apparent.
Constructive comments about report's introduction:
The information was good, but the writing style is a little bumpy.I feel that it needs to be "broken down" a little farther. But it is a really good start for the introduction, just needs a little "revision."
Organization = _/ 5 pts.
5 - Report includes an Introduction, a Conclusion, and sections for the School, District, and Community. Within each section, paragraphs logically group the information presented.
4 - Report includes all of the sections mentioned previously, but does not break down information into paragraphs within each section.
3 - Report is missing one of the sections.
2 - Report is missing more than one section.
0 - Report does not include any sections.
Strengths and constructive comments about report's organization:
Has lots of information. Just needs to be broken down into individual paragraphs, organized better, and finished off. I like the charts, nice touch.
Mechanics = _/ 5 pts.
5 - All information in the report is cited using APA styled- citations after the information and in a Reference section at the end of the report.
and
There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
4 - Most information is cited using APA style.
and/or
There are a noticeable number of typos or misspellings.
3 - Some citations in the References section are not in APA style, e.g. URLs are listed without the title of the website.
and/or
There are many typos, misspellings, or other writing errors.
2 - Most of the report's information is not cited, or APA style was not used.
0 - Report does not include a Reference section.
Strengths and constructive comments about report's organization:
It seems that the information is cited in APA style. 4
Conclusion = _ / 5 pts.
5 - Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district
The conclusion has a lot of facts in it. I think that some of these facts (i.e.- senior project) can be included in the analysis of the school. In my view, the conclusion should be more about wrapping up and reviewing what has already been said. It's good, but needs to be a little more about "wrapping it up" rather than adding information.
Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Author: (Person who wrote report.)
Editor: (Person evaluating report.)
Total Score for this Evaluation: _/35 pts
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Rubric
Introduction = _ / 5 pts.
The information was good, but the writing style is a little bumpy.I feel that it needs to be "broken down" a little farther. But it is a really good start for the introduction, just needs a little "revision."
Organization = _/ 5 pts.
Has lots of information. Just needs to be broken down into individual paragraphs, organized better, and finished off. I like the charts, nice touch.
Mechanics = _/ 5 pts.
and
There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
and/or
There are a noticeable number of typos or misspellings.
and/or
There are many typos, misspellings, or other writing errors.
It seems that the information is cited in APA style. 4
Conclusion = _ / 5 pts.